Up to now we’ve got seen LLMs be all about textual content technology, however appears like issues are altering. Within the final 15 days, we’ve got seen Google launch its finest ever mannequin – Gemini 2.5 Professional with robust picture technology capabilities, x.ai releasing picture modifying options in Grok 3. Open AI has simply dropped its finest picture technology mannequin so far in GPT-4o. All these multimodal fashions are increasing their attain past textual content to convey visible creativity into their responses. On this weblog, we’ll examine the picture technology and modifying capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Professional, and Grok 3 to seek out which LLM is finest with regards to working with photos.
Picture Era with GPT 4o, Gemini 2.5 Professional and Grok 3
Open AI simply launched its most succesful picture technology mannequin and integrated it in GPT-4o. The end result? GPt 4o now comes with superior picture technology capabilities, with the flexibility to provide exact, correct, and photorealistic photos. This development combines multimodal understanding, enabling the mannequin to generate photos that not solely observe prompts but in addition combine textual content, context, and visible inspiration.
Gemini 2.5 Professional (Experimental) is a multimodal mannequin by Google that seamlessly integrates textual content and picture technology below a single simplified framework. This mannequin is designed to generate high-quality visuals with precision, leveraging the identical cutting-edge expertise utilized in Gemini’s pure language processing methods.
Grok 3, developed by xAI, comes with superior picture technology options that set it aside within the realm of multimodal fashions. Launched in February 2025, Grok 3 integrates a strong autoregressive picture technology mannequin, code-named Aurora, designed to provide high-quality, photorealistic photos from textual content prompts.
Key Options and The best way to Entry
| Particulars | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Options |
• Photorealistic, exact picture technology • Multimodal: integrates textual content and visible context • Transforms uploaded photos • Wonderful textual content rendering in photos • Context-aware, constant visuals • Free + paid entry (cellular & net, not but on API) |
• Excessive-quality photos aligned with narrative • Quick efficiency, low compute requirement • Superior reasoning & contextual accuracy • Multi-turn conversational picture modifying • Excels at lengthy, prolonged textual content rendering • Designed to make picture technology conversational |
• Excessive-quality, lifelike picture technology • Reimagines and edits user-uploaded photos • Correct textual content rendering in photos • Actual-time refinements through pure language • Free entry through X platform (Grok.com) |
| The best way to Entry |
1. Go to: https://chatgpt.com/ 2. Log into your account 3. Choose GPT-4o from mannequin dropdown |
1. Go to: https://aistudio.google.com/welcome 2. Log into Google AI Studio 3. Beneath “Run Settings”, select Gemini 2.5 Professional (Experimental) mannequin |
1. Log into your X account 2. Entry Grok through www.grok.com |
Picture Era: GPT 4o vs Gemini 2.5 Professional vs Grok 3
I’ll be evaluating the picture technology capabilities of the three fashions on the next three duties:
- Textual content Rendering
- Instruction Following
- In Context Studying
Let’s begin with every certainly one of them and examine the outcomes.
Process 1: Textual content Rendering
Immediate: “I’m opening a conventional idea restaurant in Marin referred to as Haein. It focuses on Korean meals cooked with natural, farm-fresh components, with a rotating menu based mostly on what’s seasonal. I would like you to design a picture – a menu incorporating the next menu gadgets – lean into the standard/rustic model whereas holding it feeling upscale and smooth. Please additionally embrace illustrations of every dish in a chic, peter rabbit model. Be sure all of the textual content is rendered accurately, with a white background.
(Prime)
Doenjang Jjigae (Fermented Soybean Stew) – $18 Home-made doenjang with native mushrooms, tofu, and seasonal greens served with rice.
Galbi Jjim (Braised Quick Ribs) – $34 Sluggish-braised native grass-fed beef ribs with pear and black garlic glaze, seasonal root greens, and jujube.
Grilled Seasonal Fish – Market Value ($22-$30) Complete or fillet of native, sustainable fish grilled over charcoal, served with perilla leaf ssam and house-made sauces.
Bibimbap – $19 Heirloom rice with a rotating number of farm-fresh greens, house-fermented gochujang, and pasture-raised egg.
Bossam (Heritage Pork Wraps) – $28 Sluggish-cooked pork stomach with napa cabbage wraps, oyster kimchi, perilla, and seasonal condiments.
(Backside) Dessert & Drinks Seasonal Makgeolli (Rice Wine) – $12/glass
Rotating flavors based mostly on seasonal fruits and flowers (persimmon, citrus, elderflower, and so on.).
Hoddeok (Korean Candy Pancake) – $9 Pan-fried cinnamon-stuffed pancake with black sesame ice cream.”
GPT 4o Output:
Gemini 2.5 Professional:
Grok 3 Output:
Evaluate
| Mannequin | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence | It’s very tough to seek out fault on this picture. Though the picture technology takes time, all of the textual content particulars that have been talked about within the immediate are coated within the generated picture. The picture additionally consists of related photos of various dishes positioned subsequent to the place they’re being coated within the menu. | There are some wins and a few losses within the picture generated by this mannequin. The generated picture did cowl numerous the dishes talked about within the immediate however not all of them. The descriptions it generated weren’t in English however in another language. The photographs it included weren’t as related to the dishes. | The mannequin generated two photos however none of them have been actually related for the duty. Neither of the 2 photos coated any dish talked about within the immediate. Furthermore, the ultimate picture didn’t seem because the picture of a menu. |
It’s shocking to see a mannequin seize this a lot quantity of context inside a single picture however GPT 4o picture technology certainly is groundbreaking! It didn’t miss a single component within the immediate and the ultimate picture it generated regarded like an expert menu.
Verdict
For this activity GPT 4o is the winner. Gemini 2.5 Professional comes second whereas Grok 3 takes up third place.
Process 2: Instruction Following
Immediate: “A sq. picture containing a 4-row by 4-column grid containing 16 objects on a white background. Go from left to proper, prime to backside. Right here’s the listing:
a blue star
crimson triangle
inexperienced sq.
pink circle
orange hourglass
purple infinity signal
black and white polka dot bowtie
tiedye “42”
an orange cat carrying a black baseball cap
a map with a treasure chest
a pair of googly eyes
a thumbs up emoji
a pair of scissors
a blue and white giraffe
the phrase “OpenAI” written in cursive
a rainbow-colored lightning bolt”
Output by GPT 4o
Output by Gemini 2.5 Professional
Output by Grok 3
Evaluate
| Mannequin | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence | The generated picture had all the weather talked about within the listing and in the identical order as they have been talked about. The mannequin adheres to the immediate so properly. The picture took its time however the outcomes are wonderful! What’s attention-grabbing is, behind the ultimate picture; the mannequin did create 5 variations on the backend and what it gave us was the perfect of these 5. So mannequin can be evaluating its photos by itself and offering us with the perfect one! | The generated picture has all the things we requested for and readability that has by no means been seen earlier than! Identical to GPT 4o, the mannequin generated within the order that was talked about within the immediate and all it took was hardly 2 seconds! The velocity and the standard of picture technology by Gemini 2.5 Professional is really spectacular. | The mannequin generated a picture that matched the immediate’s theme however missed fairly a number of parts. It repeated “star”, “cat” and “bow tie” however missed a number of others like pair of eyes, circle, sq., and extra. It generated the output rapidly however the generated picture is a miss. |
Each GPT 4o and Gemini 2.5 Professional generated wonderful photos. Each the photographs had all the weather and within the order that was talked about within the immediate. Whereas GPT 4o took time to generate the photographs; it was Gemini 2.5 Professional that acquired the standard and velocity.
Verdict
For this activity Gemini 2.5 Professional is the winner. GPT 4o comes second whereas Grok 3 takes up third place.
Process 3: In Context Studying
Immediate 1: “A photorealistic picture of a blue chainsaw”
Immediate 2: “Make an advert for this chainsaw, of a grandma carving the turkey on the Thanksgiving dinner desk. add a tagline”
Output by GPT 4o
Output by Gemini 2.5 Professional
Output by Grok 3
Evaluate
| Mannequin | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence | The primary picture was fairly simple, but the mannequin took its candy time to generate it. The second picture though was in context with the primary and GPT 4o did an awesome job with it. The caption it added was smart and written accurately. Some minor particulars just like the eyes of individuals within the picture and fingers in some locations have been crooked. Just like the final time, the mannequin generated 4 photos within the backend and gave us the perfect out of these 4. | The photographs generated by Gemini 2.5 Professional have been good. The primary one got here out as anticipated however the second had points. Whereas the small print within the picture have been properly captured. The palms and the eyes have been immaculate, there have been some factual and technical errors like knife slicing a chainsaw. However as all the time the mannequin generated the photographs actually rapidly and with an in depth immediate may need given us an excellent higher picture. | Grok 3 generated the primary picture rather well. Within the second picture, whereas the standard of the picture was good; with particulars like palms and eyes managed properly. The mannequin failed to include the caption within the picture. However what was nice in regards to the picture was the selection we acquired and the velocity at which the mannequin generated the output. |
All of the fashions generated the primary picture rather well though GPT 4o took extra time than was required. Within the second picture; all of the fashions had some points. However in all three I preferred GPT 4o’s end result the perfect due to the standard of the output and the way carefully it resonated with the essence of the immediate.
Verdict
For this activity GPT 4o is the winner. Grok 3 comes second whereas Gemini 2.5 Professional takes up third place.
GPT 4o vs Gemini 2.5 Professional vs Grok 3: Closing Winner
| Process | GPT 4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textual content Rendering | 🥇 | 🥈 | 🥉 |
| Instruction Following | 🥇 | 🥈 | 🥉 |
| In-Context Studying | 🥇 | 🥉 | 🥈 |
Total Evaluation
| Characteristic | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Picture High quality | Finest (photorealistic, exact) | Good (quick however much less correct) | First rate (inventive however inconsistent) |
| Pace | Sluggish (prioritizes high quality) | Quickest | Quick |
| Textual content Rendering | Flawless textual content in photos | Typically incorrect | Typically misses textual content |
| Modifying | Conversational refinement | Multi-turn edits | Reimagines uploaded photos |
| Artistic Freedom | Reasonable (follows prompts) | Reasonable | Highest (fewer filters) |
| Context Consciousness | Finest (understands nuance) | Good | Struggles with complexity |
| Entry | Free + paid (ChatGPT) | Free (Google AI Studio) | Free (X/Grok.com) |
| Restrictions | Reasonable (avoids delicate content material) | Strict (Google’s security filters) | Minimal (most permissive) |
| Finest For | Skilled/correct work | Fast iterations | Experimental/creative use |
GPT 4o: is a game-changer on the earth of picture technology and it stood out towards Gemini 2.0 Flash Picture Era (Experimental) and Grok 3.
- The mannequin takes time to generate photos which generally is a bummer at instances. Nevertheless, a key function of the mannequin is that it evaluates its outcomes.
- Within the background; it really works with a number of photos without delay (based mostly on the complexity of the duty) and generates the perfect of these variations – this sort of self-evaluation and consciousness has by no means been seen earlier than.
Gemini 2.5 Professional: Identified for its velocity and talent to rapidly generate and refine photos, it excels in conversational modifying.
- It follows the directions rather well however can perform a little higher with textual content. The mannequin generates the primary draft rather well and required simply an elaborate prompts to generate higher responses. Additionally, with a number of prompts you will get any sort of outcomes from the mannequin.
Grok 3: Affords speedy picture technology with a concentrate on inventive freedom and real-time changes.
- Whereas it shines in inventive iterations, it struggles with accuracy and might miss essential particulars, making it much less dependable for duties that demand detailed and structured picture creation.
Additionally Learn: OpenAI’s 4o Picture Era is SUPER COOL
Conclusion
The speedy developments in multimodal AI fashions have opened new prospects for picture technology and modifying, with GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Professional, and Grok 3 every bringing distinctive strengths to the desk. Whereas GPT-4o units a excessive normal for precision, context-awareness, and high quality; it does so at the price of velocity. Then again, Gemini 2.5 Professional prioritizes fast outcomes and conversational modifying. In the meantime, Grok 3 emphasizes inventive freedom and quick iterations however struggles with accuracy and structured duties.
For now, the “finest” mannequin finally is determined by particular person wants—whether or not it’s GPT-4o’s unparalleled accuracy, Gemini 2.5 Professional’s agility, or Grok 3’s imaginative flexibility. The way forward for AI-driven visuals is shiny, with countless potential for innovation throughout industries and inventive fields.
Often Requested Questions
A. GPT-4o at the moment delivers essentially the most exact and contextually correct picture technology, although it processes requests extra slowly than opponents.
A. Gemini 2.0 Flash affords the quickest picture technology, making it preferrred for speedy iterations, although typically at the price of accuracy.
A. Grok 3 imposes fewer content material restrictions than GPT-4o or Gemini, enabling extra experimental outputs, however struggles with detailed directions.
A. All three assist some picture modifying: GPT-4o and Gemini permit conversational refinements, whereas Grok 3 can reimagine uploaded photos.
A. GPT-4o excels at precisely incorporating textual content into photos, whereas Gemini typically renders incorrectly and Grok usually omits textual content totally.
A. Presently all three provide free entry: GPT-4o (with utilization limits), Gemini (in experimental part), and Grok (for X/Twitter customers).
A. GPT-4o is gradual, Gemini may be inconsistent with advanced prompts, and Grok prioritizes creativity over precision in structured duties.
Anu Madan is an knowledgeable in tutorial design, content material writing, and B2B advertising, with a expertise for reworking advanced concepts into impactful narratives. Together with her concentrate on Generative AI, she crafts insightful, progressive content material that educates, evokes, and drives significant engagement.
Login to proceed studying and revel in expert-curated content material.