Is o3-mini Higher Than o1 for Picture Evaluation?

In the present day, OpenAI introduced o3-mini’s new picture evaluation capabilities and unveiled its roadmap for GPT-4.5 and GPT-5. Whereas the hype is excessive for the upcoming GPT fashions, this text goes to give attention to o3-mini’s new picture evaluation function, evaluating it with o1. We’ll first do an o3-mini vs o1 comparability based mostly on their performances on normal benchmarks. After which we’ll check each the fashions throughout a number of image-based duties like recognizing picture variations, fixing mathematical equations from visuals, and decoding advanced diagrams. By the top, we’ll discover out which mannequin delivers superior picture evaluation and at what duties every one performs greatest.

o1 vs. o3-mini: Benchmark Efficiency

o3-mini and o1 are two of OpenAI’s best-performing fashions for advanced reasoning and problem-solving duties, every with distinct strengths. Earlier than we start with the comparability, let’s take a look at the structure of each the fashions and perceive how they suppose.

o3-mini follows a dense transformer structure, using all parameters per token to maximise accuracy, making it extremely efficient however computationally demanding. In distinction, o1, optimized for logical reasoning and mathematical duties, balances effectivity and efficiency with a structured processing strategy. This distinction performs a vital function of their benchmark outcomes, influencing their respective strengths throughout varied domains.

Additionally Learn: Can o3-mini Change DeepSeek-R1 for Logical Reasoning?

Now, right here’s how the 2 fashions carried out within the LiveBench set of checks.

Sources: livebench.ai

As you’ll be able to see, the benchmark evaluations present o3-mini (excessive) being in shut competitors with o1 (excessive) with world averages of 75.88 and 75.67, respectively. That being stated, o3-mini excels in coding and knowledge evaluation, making it ultimate for structured programming and analytics. In the meantime, o1 dominates in reasoning and math, proving to be superior in numerical problem-solving. Moreover, o1’s language rating highlights its energy in linguistically advanced duties. Whereas o3-mini provides a balanced ability set, o1’s superior logic and language capabilities make it a compelling alternative for technical functions requiring deep analytical reasoning.

Additionally Learn: Is OpenAI’s o3-mini Higher Than DeepSeek-R1?

How you can Entry o1 and o3-mini?

The o1 and o3-mini fashions can be found to ChatGPT Plus and ChatGPT Professional customers. Whereas the ChatGPT Professional plan permits limitless chats, the Plus plan solely permits a restricted variety of chats with the fashions. The free model of ChatGPT makes use of o3-mini on the again for a restricted variety of reasoning queries per day. To entry the fashions:

• Head to ChatGPT and login to your Professional/Plus account.
• On the prime, on the left-hand aspect of the display, beneath the mannequin alternative, you’ll be able to choose the mannequin that you simply want to work with.

Additionally Learn: How you can Run OpenAI’s o3-mini on Google Colab?

o1 vs o3-mini: Picture Evaluation Comparability

With o1 and o3-mini each making waves within the subject of AI, the controversy over which mannequin reigns supreme is heating up. Whereas o3-mini is OpenAI’s most superior reasoning mannequin, optimized for structured problem-solving and programming, o1 has emerged as a powerhouse in logical deduction, mathematical reasoning, and language comprehension.

To settle the rating, we’re placing each fashions to the check with 5 rigorous challenges:

• Discovering the variations between two photographs
• Predicting chess strikes
• Fixing a mathematical equation
• Figuring out and explaining a scientific diagram
• Decoding and analyzing a graph

Problem 1: Picture Evaluation with Object Identification

Immediate: “Within the given picture Establish all of the variations between them and describe them in brief.“

Response by o1

Response by o3-mini

Comparative Evaluation

o3-mini offers a extra detailed and nuanced evaluation of the picture variations in comparison with o1. Whereas o1 accurately identifies main distinctions, o3-mini goes a step additional by capturing delicate variations just like the bear’s smile and the precise placement of bees. This demonstrates o3-mini’s superior observational precision and a focus to positive particulars, making it a stronger alternative for duties requiring visible reasoning and meticulous evaluation.

Problem 2: Picture Evaluation with Logical Reasoning

Immediate: “Analyze this chessboard place. Counsel the most effective transfer for the present participant (white) to checkmate black and clarify the reasoning.”

Response by o1

Response by o3-mini

Comparative Evaluation

Each o3 and o1 supplied incorrect solutions once I in contrast their responses based mostly on the chess-related immediate. I used to be testing these fashions to see how precisely they deal with duties associated to chess, however sadly, each of them didn’t ship the right answer. Regardless of their capabilities, the outputs didn’t align with the expectations for an issue that requires reasoning and data of chess guidelines.

Problem 3: Picture Evaluation with Mathematical Reasoning

Immediate: “Clear up the mathematical equation within the picture“

Response by o1

Response by o3-mini

Comparative Evaluation

Each o3-mini and o1 accurately determine the roots of the polynomial P(x) = x^3 + 2x^2 – 5x – 6 utilizing the Rational Root Theorem, artificial division, and factoring. Nevertheless, o3-mini presents the answer in a structured in a step-by-step method with clear formatting, making it extra readable. o1, alternatively, offers a really comparable rationalization however seems barely much less structured, with some redundancy within the rationalization. Each responses arrive on the right closing reply: the roots x=−1,2,−3 however o3-mini presents a clearer and barely extra refined strategy.

Problem 4: Picture Evaluation with Scientific Clarification

Immediate: “Establish the experiment proven within the picture. Clarify what is occurring and what are the outcomes of the experiment.“

Response by o1

Response by o3-mini

Comparative Evaluation

Each o3-mini and o1 present correct explanations of the Miller-Urey Experiment, detailing its function, methodology, and significance. Nevertheless, the o3-mini presents the data in a extra structured, well-organized method with clear headings and bullet factors, making it simpler to observe. It explicitly emphasizes the continual biking of gases and highlights the importance of the experiment in astrobiology. Alternatively, o1 provides additional particulars, such because the sampling probe and warmth supply, which give further context however will not be as obligatory for a basic rationalization. Whereas each responses are right, o3-mini provides a extra polished and reader-friendly presentation, whereas o1 offers a barely extra detailed breakdown of the experiment’s setup.

Problem 5: Picture Evaluation with Knowledge Interpretation

Immediate: “The bar graph given beneath exhibits the gross sales of books (in thousand quantity) from six branches of a publishing firm throughout two consecutive years 2000 and 2001.

Gross sales of Books (in thousand numbers) from Six Branches – B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 and B6 of a publishing Firm in 2000 and 2001. 

What’s the ratio of the overall gross sales of department B2 for each years to the overall gross sales of department B4 for each years?
A. 2:3 
B. 3:5 
C. 4:5 
D. 7:9”

Response by o1

Response by o3-mini

Comparative Evaluation

Each o3-mini and o1 present right solutions for calculating the ratio of whole gross sales for branches B2 and B4, arriving on the right reply of seven:9 (possibility D). Nevertheless, the o3-mini presents a extra structured and reader-friendly strategy, breaking the answer into clear steps: extracting gross sales knowledge, computing the ratio, simplifying, and figuring out the right reply. This logical move improves readability and comprehension. In distinction, o1 follows the identical steps however has formatting inconsistencies, significantly in fraction illustration, making it barely tougher to observe. Whereas each responses are correct, o3-mini delivers a extra polished and well-organized rationalization, whereas o1 offers the identical logic with minor formatting points.

Comparative Evaluation Abstract

Additionally Learn: Is Google Gemini 2.0 Professional Experimental Higher Than OpenAI o3-mini?

Conclusion

On this o3-mini vs o1 comparability, we’ve seen that o3-mini offers higher responses than o1 in most situations. It demonstrates sturdy reasoning skills, structured explanations, and a focus to element, making it a standout performer in lots of duties. Furthermore, its means to interrupt down advanced issues into well-structured steps enhances readability and comprehension.

Whereas o1 can be a succesful mannequin, it often struggles with formatting inconsistencies and provides barely much less structured responses. Nevertheless, it nonetheless offers correct reasoning and strong logical move.

Neither mannequin is flawless—each had difficulties with chess-based reasoning and whereas o3-mini tends to current extra polished responses, o1 generally provides further contextual particulars. Regardless of their limitations, each fashions show to be useful instruments for enhancing productiveness in problem-solving, evaluation, and interpretation duties.

Steadily Requested Questions