When curious minds Google “LOLCow,” a phrase making the rounds throughout TikTok, the primary hyperlink to populate is to an outdated weblog server, its mission preserved solely in Google’s archived web page description: “Anonymously share juicy gossip and candid opinions about silly and weird individuals, also referred to as lolcows. Freedom of speech pleasant.”
City Dictionary suggests a number of related, however various, definitions for a LOLCow. An individual “who is simple/protected for almost all of individuals to mock. It is a money cow however you as a substitute milk ‘lols’ from it,” describes one. One other: “A lolcow is an individual you get in depth laughs from, who would not know they’re being made enjoyable of. They will typically suppose they’re admired for what they’re doing, however secretly are being laughed at continuously.” And, much less to the purpose, “Somebody who makes a idiot of themselves on the web time and again. Normally drug spurred.” A ultimate one for the sports activities followers: “A time period that can be utilized to explain a perennial manufacturing unit of disappointment in sports activities…”
The idea, whereas contemporary in TikTok’s vernacular, is not notably new, a vestige of early web days the place nameless accounts gave customers the gall to overtly harass one another as a part of the digital carnival. It is a time period integral to the 4Chan lexicon, and lots of level to Christine Chandler, a former blogger now embattled by on-line trolls and accusations of each unlawful and unethical conduct, as one of many web’s preeminent LOLCows.
What has developed for the reason that days of accepted on-line trolling is most people’s entry to the LOLCow. New one-stop-shop platforms like TikTok supply creators intense spikes of virality (and cash) practically in a single day, typically stemming from the algorithm’s crowning of a brand new app obsession.
Not simply fodder for a fleeting meme or an obsessive sub neighborhood, these people turn into the star of everybody’s FYP. They’re flown out to collaborate with massive creators, pegged for model offers, and given the instruments to show their on-line persona — which, in lots of circumstances, stems from the power to be mocked — right into a supply of revenue. An setting rife for manipulation, TikTok obscures the fashionable LOLCow beneath the guise of affection and fandom. Obsessive posters aren’t all the time following simply to be merciless, some imagine, no less than in accordance with their feedback, they’re constructing neighborhood with the web’s underdogs.
‘Milking’ LOLCows: trendy bullying or innocent enjoyable?
In a 7-minute lengthy video posted by person @PinkBinz on Aug. 31, TikTok’s model of a “LOLCow” is described because the goal of “center college bully” conduct, by which a person is uplifted by disingenuous engagement from viewers. To be extra exact, in accordance with the creator, the LOLCow is thinly-veiled cruelty, if not outright ableism. “LOLCows are nearly all the time picked out by the web as a result of they primarily have disabilities,” she says, pointing to the rise of creator Shawty Bae, who has not recognized as somebody with a incapacity. “Ninety-nine % of the time, if these individuals had been by no means concerned within the web, their life would have been fully completely different. Many of the issues that occur to them of their actual life have occurred because of the affect of individuals on the web bullying them.”
In a remark preferred greater than 13,000 instances, one viewer added, “lolcows are proper wing pipelines to attempt to make it seem like disabled persons are risks to society. It’s weight loss plan eugenics.”
One other video, posted in 2023 by @GamerMagee, argues that extra consideration must be paid to the people who find themselves baiting creators. “The extent of depravity of the people who find themselves f*cking with them is simply mindboggling,” he mentioned. Commenters likened the rise of LOLCows to the recognition of TV exhibits on channels like TLC, parading “uncommon” behaviors, appearances, or trauma for rankings.
Mashable High Tales
Not all watchers really feel that means, nevertheless, arguing they discover these creators relatable or that they solely need to “verify in” on them out of compassion. “In case you are ever questioning why you might be drawn to shawtybae, it’s as a result of she doesn’t attempt to be anybody however herself. In a world that wishes perfection, she doesn’t take herself too critically and he or she’s extremely humble regardless of her fame,” wrote one person on a YouTube video that includes Shawty Bae.
“Genuine” is joined by different, much less type phrases used to explain the TikTok creators pegged as new period LOLCows: “straightforward targets,” “gullible,” “weak,” “memeable.” Viewers on @PinkBinz’ video chimed in with dozens of examples falling beneath these classes, every with fervent “fanbases,” together with viral pages of these like Tophia Chu, trans creator Elphaba Orion Doherty, Daniel Larson, and — one of the vital controversial — @WorldOfTshirts. Joshua Block, the face of World of Tshirts, shot to recognition within the pandemic-spawned TikTok growth, recognized for his every day vlogs round New York Metropolis that includes spontaneous performances, verbal assails, and damaging ingesting. His account, adopted by 3.6 million individuals, boasts much more hundreds of thousands of views by onlookers who proclaim to obsessively watch his movies out of morbid fascination.
Block and Chandler are examples of the grim path “LOL farming” can head, the place incessant goading leads creators down more and more dangerous pathways and sometimes abusive conduct, lobbed towards themselves or others. In some examples, LOLCows are outrightly doxxed or the victims of swatting. In others, they turn into engagement-getters for different creators, like the connection between Block and creator Mr. Based mostly NYC, utilizing them to develop their very own channels.
LOLing outdoors of TikTok
There exist extra mainstream cases, too: The obsessive protection of YouTube star Gabbie Hanna’s erratic conduct and subsequent manic breakdown, documented in its completeness on her TikTok web page. Or the mass consumption and meme-ing of Britney Spears’ eccentric social media movies, particularly these posted throughout her struggle for independence from her conservatorship, that nonetheless continues at the moment.
Much more difficult: A number of the hottest LOLCows are, within the eyes of the web (and sometimes the regulation), “dangerous” individuals, the perpetrators of reliable crimes, threats, or problematic conduct. Others branded with the title are right-wing, and even white supremacist, figureheads. Cancel tradition thus collides with LOLCows in a flurry of retaliatory on-line conduct.
Off TikTok, there are devoted subreddits and Discord servers tasked with following the spirals of those creators, together with Block, with posts oscillating between concern and mockery. This on-line voyeurism additionally features a 15-year-old Wiki web page devoted to Chandler’s actions and a whole host of “snark” pages providing boards for widespread LOLCow dialogue.
TikTok & LOLCows: Made for one another
To many, TikTok is greater than a hub for viral humor and proposals, it is a LOLCow manufacturing unit farm.
And the place blogs of yore had been extra up entrance with their cruelty, the fashionable notion of a LOLCow is much less on-the-nose in its detestation of distinction. As a substitute, individuals say they interact out of the urge to supply recommendation or, extra generally, actuality checks — take the incessant commentary spawning from the relationship weblog of life-style creator Molly Rutter as instance. Others, for all intents and functions, say they’re real followers of the creator. Feedback like “you already know what, hell yeah” or “cannot inform the chat I f*ck with this” convey the concept that these human beings are an embarrassing responsible pleasure. However what’s much more regarding is how the fashionable social media panorama exacerbates these urges. Platforms harnessing limitless scrolling, pushing e-commerce alternatives, and including all-encompassing search integrations, preserve individuals locked to their units, a suggestions loop between creator and person that promotes much more obsession.
Will web tradition develop out of LOLing at individuals?
Within the age of on-line profitability — the probabilities of the creator financial system not but found within the early 2000s — this parasocial relationship can lead down sudden paths. A number of the aforementioned personalities and different ridiculed creators have pivoted to grownup content material, linking Solely Followers pages of their bios to capitalize off of their virality. Within the case of ShawtyBae, express pictures taken from her Solely Followers account had been leaked on-line with out consent, extra gas for the fireplace. Others lean into money-making ventures via model offers, movie star appearances, or product endorsements. Public ridicule turns into inextricably tied to their livelihood.
At giant, increasingly persons are reckoning with the moral repercussions of posting on social media, from the generational trauma of household vlogging, to the platforming of individuals with disabilities by creators, with or with out their consent. The revival of the phrase LOLCow in public consciousness, whereas a regarding continuation, suggests extra persons are changing into conscious of social media’s darkish aspect.
Alongside rising self-awareness, and a renewed love of criticism, amongst customers, some are repositioning the phrase as a behavioral verify for his or her friends on-line: Are you actually participating with a creator out of sympathy, enjoyment, or care… or are you milking them for “LOLs”?
Matters
Social Good
TikTok